- People
- Leadership & Staff
- Research faculty
- Gabriela Aceves-Sepúlveda
- Alissa N. Antle
- Sheelagh Carpendale
- Parmit Chilana
- Jon Corbett
- Steve DiPaola
- Halil Erhan
- Brian Fisher
- Marek Hatala
- Kate Hennessy
- Alireza Karduni
- Sylvain Moreno
- Carman Neustaedter
- Will Odom
- Philippe Pasquier
- Niranjan Rajah
- Bernhard Riecke
- Gillian Russell
- Thecla Schiphorst
- Chris Shaw
- Wolfgang Stuerzlinger
- Ron Wakkary
- Ö. Nilay Yalçin
- Palashi Vaghela
- Teaching faculty
- Emeritus
- Adjunct Faculty
- Alumni
- Work at SIAT
- Opportunities
- Research
- Programs
- Undergraduate
- Graduate
- Micro-credentials
- News & Events
- Spaces & Equipment
- StudioSIAT
- Media
- Showcase
- Showcase Submission Form
- Spring 2026 Project Showcase
- IAT 265 Louie's Sandwicheria
- IAT 265 Katana Master
- IAT 265 Supermarket Simulator
- IAT 312 Nightborder
- IAT 312 End of the World
- IAT 313 The Tavern
- IAT 343 Under Pressure
- IAT 343 Pot Bound
- IAT 343 WORLDS
- IAT 343 The Heist
- IAT 351 ReCallia
- IAT 355 Pokemon Cultural Relevance
- IAT 355 The Triad of Modern Cinema
- IAT 355 The Uneven Wave
- IAT 355 Delivered
- IAT 355 Dead Internet Theory
- IAT 355 Every AI Query Has a Carbon Cost
- IAT 355 Youtube Trending Analysis
- IAT 355 TikTok Vs Spotify
- IAT 355 Marbled Murrelet Habitat & Population in BC
- IAT 380 Charlotte Destivelle
- IAT 380 Lumi & Pip
- IAT 380 Selene the Low Rent Exorcist
- IAT 410 Witch's Winter
- IAT 410 Arcane Redemption
- IAT 410 AstrOh-No!
- IAT 410 Fantaseum
- IAT 445 Atom Viscera
- IAT 459 TrailTracker
- IAT 459 UniBazaar
- IAT 499 Beneath the Grey
- IAT 459 Mixtape
- Fall 2025 Project Showcase
- IAT 100 Onions on the Side
- IAT 100 LEGS
- IAT 100 Where is My Husband
- IAT 202 On the Line
- IAT 233 The Voronial Pavilion
- IAT 235 CMC Pet
- IAT 238 Jazzdor Festival Microsite
- IAT 265 Aquarium Life
- IAT 312 Greedy Goblins
- IAT 312 Take the Reins
- IAT 313 Hollow Sacrifice: A Dying World
- IAT 313 Sporefall: No One Left Behind
- IAT 313 The Innocent's Descent
- IAT 333 Mastercard Fraud Analysis Dashboard
- IAT 333 Vancouver Police Museum: Adaptive Mode
- IAT 334 Roominate
- IAT 334 Spotify Jam Feature Addition
- IAT 343 The Secret of the Skygarden
- IAT 343 Autoviscera
- IAT 343 We'll Be Right Back
- IAT 351 Moody
- IAT 351 Anchor Funds
- IAT 355 The Voyager
- IAT 355 The Housing Crisis
- IAT 359 Chemtrails: The All-in-One Travel Planner
- IAT 359 Consistency
- IAT 387 PhoenixRise
- IAT 445 Santa's Little Helper
- IAT 445 Something Lurking
- Spring 2025 Project Showcase
- Fall 2024 Project Showcase
- Summer 2024 Project Showcase
- Spring 2024 Project Showcase
- Fall 2023 Project Showcase
- Spring 2023 Project Showcase
- Fall 2022 Project Showcase
- Spring 2022 Project Showcase
- Fall 2021 Project Showcase
- Spring 2021 Project Showcase
- Fall 2020 Project Showcase
- Contact
- Staff & faculty resources
Undergraduate
Experiential learning embraces experts and engagement
By Diane Luckow, originally featured on SFU News.
This fall, students taking the IAT-333 Interaction Design Methods course will be learning from some of the world’s best, including Scott Davidoff, the human interfaces design manager for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The course, in the School of Interactive Arts and Technology, teaches students how to use design methods to build user-friendly digital applications, systems and services—and it epitomizes the latest in experiential learning.
Weekly video conferences feature international experts working in human-computer interaction design for large multinational companies and the public sector, as well as for small design firms and consultancies. This semester’s experts include David Royer of LinkedIn, Naheel Jawaid of Google NYC, and NASA’s Davidoff, whose team creates innovative user interfaces for working naturally and intuitively with technologies that support NASA’s space exploration missions.
These experts will discuss how they use and adapt design-oriented theories and methods within their professional practice, and how their understanding of these methods has evolved over time.
“Talking about these issues with international experts in design really changes the game for students,” says professor William Odom.
“It’s a bridge between education, the university setting and professional practice. It changes the dynamics in the classroom when students understand why they need to learn key theory and methods, and their practical value in a professional setting.”
Students begin their semester’s course work by forming small teams and then selecting and acquiring a local client with whom they can work on a human-computer interaction design project.
“I don’t pre-arrange the local clients,” says Odom. “This course pushes the students to move beyond the campus and find an organization they would like to work with. They learn how to broker agreements, set expectations and, in a sense, take ownership over their own education. This process gives students more buy-in because they’re passionate about working with their client.”
A studio-based learning approach ensures students learn to objectively receive and deliver weekly critiques of their project work.
“They learn to criticize their project findings, their design methods and their technical design skills,” says Odom, who notes there is a 40-student waiting list to get into the course.
“Everything they do has to have an intention and an argument for why they are doing it. This course is experiential learning from the first to last day, and that branches into other key takeaways, such as co-op internships, other courses, and great jobs.”
SIAT student Venus Lau, who took the course last semester, is moving on this fall to a plum, eight-month internship with multinational software firm SAP.
“Experiential learning is my preference,” says Lau. “The videoconferencing with the experts was really insightful. But what I appreciated most was that William tried to foster the idea of a design studio, with lots of student participation. He always encouraged students to break out of their comfort zones by urging them to provide critical, constructive feedback to other teams, and to listen to the other students’ critiques. This teaching approach was really effective for our own learning, and helped us get a sense of a real work environment.”